The father had failed to inform the mother, Ms M, fearing she would commit suicide or have an abortion. Ms M has now been allowed to take her case to the Court of Appeal, where judges will examine the case of doctor-patient confidentiality and consider a ruling whereby medical staff are bound by the duty of care to inform family members of transmission of serious disease. The full exercise of the this remit under the revised duty would sometimes include breaching doctor-patient confidentiality.
Challenge the decision
Ms M’s compensation claim was rejected by the High Court, which commented that to impose liability in the case would constitute a 'radical departure'. The judge also said that he was unwilling to take the 'giant step' of creating a new duty of care. However, Ms M's lawyers have been awarded the opportunity to challenge the decision under the argument that the High Court ruling has violated her rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Source: Scottish Legal