• Home »
  • Big stories »
  • US appeals court revives case against CBS over remastered recordings

21 August 2018 at 09:32 BST

US appeals court revives case against CBS over remastered recordings

Plaintiffs claimed pre-1972 recording copyright infringed by the music company

Al Green Shutterstock

An intellectual property lawsuit over originality in remastered recordings has been revived by a federal appeals court. The suit accuses entertainment giants CBS Corp and CBS Radio of copyright infringement for playing digitally remastered songs recorded before 1972 by top recording artists including Al Green, the Everly Brothers,and Jackie Wilson on radio stations and online.

Question of originality

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California said a lower court judge acted too quickly in saying federal copyright law preempted California state law claims by the plaintiffs, which owned the original analog recordings. Circuit Judge Richard Linn wrote for a 3-0 panel , ‘a digitally remastered sound recording made as a copy of the original analog sound recording will rarely exhibit the necessary originality to qualify for independent copyright protection.’ According to a Reuters report, the decision has been welcomed as a victory for owners of older songs, who drew support from the Recording Industry Association of America trade group, and have for many years battled broadcasters in court over royalties. Some owners have found success in arguing that state laws forbade playing their songs without permission. Recordings before February 15, 1972 are not covered by federal copyright law.

Case returned

The plaintiffs ABS Entertainment Inc, Barnaby Records Inc, Brunswick Record Corp and Malaco Inc sued over CBS’s playing of songs they had remastered from their original analog format. Such remasterings can change songs’ original timbre, sound balance and loudness, but otherwise leave them unedited. In May 2016, US District Judge Percy Anderson in Los Angeles said CBS, which according to court papers did not use analog recordings, should not pay because the remastered recordings were authorized ‘derivative works’ governed only by federal copyright law. Judge Linn, who normally sits on the Federal Circuit appeals court in Washington, DC, said aural changes resulting from digitally remastering analog recordings generally do not ‘exhibit the minimum level of originality to be copyrightable.’ He also said the plaintiffs’ state law copyrights were ‘distinct’ from rights inherent in the remasterings, and the CBS counterarguments would leave the plaintiffs ‘uncompensated and without control of distribution of their creative product.’ The appeals court returned the case to Judge Anderson, including for a review of the plaintiffs’ class-action claims.


Also read...

Confusion over big four Indian law change

Report says big four accounting firms may soon be able to practice law in India after all.