• Home »
  • Global view »
  • San Francisco law firms look set to pay disputed partnership tax

San Francisco law firms look set to pay disputed partnership tax

By Neasa MacErlean

27 April 2015 at 08:08 BST

Arnold Porter, Orrick and 23 other law firms appear to have worn out their challenges against a partnership tax for which they are now expected to pay a levy of 1.5 per cent of payroll on services carried out within the city.

A partnership tax is on the way for law firms in San Francisco blurAZ

The firms - represented by Amy Silverstein  of Silverstein & Pomerantz LLP - had challenged 'Proposition Q', a headcount tax which has been extended to cover partnerships as well as other businesses. But the firms look likely to have reached the end of the road in their appeals - as the California Supreme Court has just refused to hear an appeal on the subject.


The other firms which had opposed the application of the tax to them include Herrington & Sutcliffe, Latham & Watkins, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Hanson Bridget, Shartsis Friese and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. However, a spokesman for the City of San Francisco - Deputy City Attorney James M. Emery - said that the tax 'will sunset in three years'. Source: Bloomberg


Also read...

Orrick recruits Watson Farley private equity partner

Orrick is continuing its focus on private equity for the energy and infrastructure market with the hire of Paul Doris from Watson Farley.