Jan 2022

Foreword: Luxury Law Over Borders Comparative Guide

The recent months of global pandemic have shown us that the Luxury Goods business has true resilience, flexibility and enduring appeal to its ever growing client base. Traditional routes to market have quietly coexisted alongside the ever dynamic e-commerce business model and supported by the explosion in social media platforms and offerings. Are we different to any other business sector? As an insider, the answer must be yes, we thrive on the personal interactions, we love to share our artisanal skills with our customers and we strive to bring the customer experience to the pinnacle of experiential interaction. A global pandemic with restrictions on travel, boutique closures and limitations on customer gatherings all conspire to challenge the prerequisites of our business model. However, as the business results show, we can adapt and continue to delight our customers with our precious creations.

The legal landscape constantly challenges the possibilities of protecting our artistic expressions through restrictions on protecting 3D trademarks globally, limiting the scope of copyright protection and jurisdictional complexities around online enforcement. Are we different? We beg to answer yes, our creations are designed to delight and endure for generations, not just a couple of years like the average consumer product. We must find ways to bridge those rights with limited lives such as designs and copyright with more strategic protection plans that can endure.

Now we can exist in a metaverse, how do our products and our rights translate into this new world of NFT’s and digitally downloadable clothing and accessories? We are on the cusp of answering that. Will the trademark regime give the necessary protection and flexibility? While our maisons aim to fulfil desires, surprise and excite with their beautiful craftsmanship, we wait to see how this translates into the metaverse and the nature of the inevitable copies. There is no decrease in the volume and sophistication of those seeking to steal our creativity and short circuit our craftsmanship, and there is no decrease in those willing to pay for a poor substitute. Can we change the thinking and cut off the demand side of the equation? Perhaps the increasing awareness of sustainability and CSR more generally will lead people to appreciate the value of intellectual property and its role in protecting true craftsmanship.

This book offers a one stop shop to the curious reader eager to navigate the cross border nature of our dilemma. No one legal tool provides the ‘silver bullet’ and this book provides the armoury needed.

Comparative Guide


Contributing Firm


EXPERT ANALYSIS

Foreword: Luxury Law Over Borders Comparative Guide

Nicolas Martin
Sheila Henderson

Chapters

Belgium

Moana Colaneri

Brazil

Luiz Edgard Montaury Pimenta
Marianna Furtado de Mendonça

China

Rebecca LIU
Yunze Lian

Cyprus

George Tashev
Ioanna Martidi
Maria Hinni
Angelos G. Paphitis

Czechia

Michael Feuerstein
Michal Havlík

France

Sophie Marc

Germany

Dr Wiebke Baars

India

Dhruv Anand
Kavya Mammen
Pravin Anand
Sampurnaa Sanyal
Udita M Patro

Italy

Fabrizio Jacobacci

Japan

Koichi Nakatani

Netherlands

Herwin Roerdink
Nadine Reijnders - Wiersma
Tjeerd Overdijk

South Korea

Dae Hyun Seo
Won Joong Kim

Spain

Carolina Montero
Eleonora Carrillo
Fernando Ortega
Ignacio Temiño
Rubén Canales

Taiwan

Crystal J Chen
Nick J.C. Lan

Turkey

Özlem Futman
Yasemin Aktas

United Kingdom

Rosie Burbidge

United States

Alan Behr
Tod M. Melgar
Yann Rim

Powered by SimSage

Jobs from Nicholas Scott

2 PQE + Private Equity Associate

Job location: London

Popular Articles

Latest Articles

Goodwin swoops on Travers for London private equity partner duo

1h

Gateley affiliate Austen Hays launches class action against Grindr, advised by Cooley

22h

Stewarts’ partner count nears treble figures as firm promotes six

23h

Baker McKenzie hires nine Munger Tolles partners in Los Angeles

1d

UK Supreme Court refuses Marks & Clerk permission to appeal in secret commissions case

1d