In-house efficiency measure remains elusive


By James Barnes

16 January 2013 at 10:47 BST


Assessing the value of a corporation's legal function is as easy as nailing jelly to a wall, a group of leading in-house lawyers recently concluded.

Difficult to get it round a legal department

Difficult to get it round a legal department

According to Australia’s New Lawyer website, a discussion held by legal services provider Plexus late last year sparked debate that left high-profile in-house lawyers perplexed.
Managing director of Plexus Andrew Mellett said there was a general feeling among in-house lawyers that there is a lack of sophisticated methods to measure the value of corporate legal departments. ‘It was agreed that the value of the in-house legal function is hard to measure, although most participants suggested they would like to be able to demonstrate and measure the value of their in-house team,’ added Mr Mellett.

Linking spending

The discussion was attended by seven prominent in-house lawyers, including two from leading Australian telecommunications businesses -- Simon Brookes, the deputy general counsel at Melbourne-based Telstra, and Jenny Rees, the general counsel with Sydney’s SingTel Optus.
A number of current methods were discussed – including linking legal expenditure to capital efficiency metrics, or quantifying the amount saved on external legal spend through a blended rate calculation.

Strategic objectives

However, the best method was deemed to be the use of a management by objectives formula.
‘This was the method that seemed to strike most of a chord,’ commented Mr Mellett. ‘It was felt that this provided a measurement of achievements around strategic objectives and ensured that those strategic objectives are also supporting critical business objectives.’

 
   
 
 
 

Also read...

Hong Kong becomes hot spot for US lawyers

The rapid growth in investigations in China into corporate misconduct has seen several US law firms increase their numbers there.