IBA attacks Saudi beheadings
Saudi Arabia is flouting international law with surge in beheadings, says IBA report which highlights record rate of execution in the kingdom.
Public executions in Saudi Arabia represent multiple breaches of international law, according to a study published today by the International Bar Association. The report calls the executions an 'arbitrary effect' of Saudi Arabia's imposition of the sharia code. So far this year, the Saudi authorities have carried out at least 134 executions, the International Bar Association's Human Right Institute states. Of these, 55 were of non-violent drug offenders and 37 were political activists killed en masse on 23 April 2019 following lengthy periods of detention, torture, and 'grossly unfair' trials. At this rate, the 2019 death toll will far exceed all previous recorded totals, the report's author, Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Helena Kennedy QC), notes.
'Arbitary' defination of life
The report catalogues numerous ways in which the Saudi penal code contravenes international law. For example, at least six of the 37 individuals executed in April were under 18 at the time of their alleged offences. Saudi Arabia has pledged to respect include the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention Against Torture and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The declaration’s outlawing of the 'arbitrary' definition of life, the report states, is not to simply be equated with 'against the law', but 'must be interpreted more broadly to include elements of inappropriateness, injustice, lack of predictability and due process of law, as well as elements of unreasonableness, lack of necessity and disproportionality'.
Matter of interpretation
All these are features of the Saudi justice system, the report argues. The country prescribes the death penalty for a wide range of crimes, including 'terrorism' which can encompass any opposition to the government. Meanwhile the circumstances in which the death penalty must or may be imposed are often unclear, as “much depends on the interpretation of imprecise passages of the Quran, the hadith or fatwas, and jurists’ approach to such interpretation appears to vary considerably’” the report explains. “This in itself is problematic, since it renders the rules and principles governing the imposition of the death penalty volatile and uncertain,” the report states. The IBA Human Rights Institute calls on Saudi Arabia to impose a moratorium on executions “with a view to ultimately abolishing the death penalty.” Meanwhile the kingdom should publish accurate information about persons on death row and allow an international fact-finding mission by an independent and politically neutral organisation to investigate further. 'The mission must be given immediate and unfettered access, as an absolute minimum, to all those who are on death row awaiting execution.'
The IBA Human Rights Institute argues that in the event of failure to comply, members of the G20 should refuse to participate in the summit due to be held in Riyadh in November next year. “Otherwise, these countries and the EU will risk normalising and even tacitly legitimising the human rights abuses being perpetrated by the Saudi regime,” the report states.