Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC) claims that the Sudanese President Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir 'committed the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur'. He faces 10 charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, for which a warrant of arrest was issued in 2008. When in South Africa at the weekend for a meeting of the African Union, President Bashir was subject to the issuing of a court order to prevent him leaving the country. On Monday morning, after the President's departure from South Africa, Judge Dunstan Mlambo ruled that the government's failure to arrest him was inconsistent with the South African constitution. The South African Litigation Centre also played a prime role in challenging the behaviour of the government.
ICC opposed by ANC
However, the ruling ANC party said through a spokesman that the ICC is 'no longer useful for the purposes for which it was intended'. The African Union itself is also opposed to the ICC. Writing in Time, the founding director of the Enough Project, John Prendergast, said: 'Undoubtedly, South Africa’s judges and lawyers are this story’s heroes...Despite head of state opposition, creative lawyers, civil society groups in Africa are recapturing the best of the legacy of Nuremberg. Sources ICC and Time
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]