Supreme Court judge says legal specialisations are 'essentially bogus'

Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption has urged legal practitioners to widen their areas of expertise with an eye on interconnectedness.
Prefer the Global Legal Post on Google

corgarashu

Speaking at a family law conference in London on Tuesday, Lord Sumption rubbished an ‘excessively specialised approach’ to legal practice, insisting that all areas of law are interconnected and that lawyers need broad-based training to match. ‘No area of law is completely self-contained,’ he argued, addressing family law directly as a particularly insular practice area. ‘Family law, like contract law, tax law, insolvency law or almost any other kind of law, has to be applied to a variety of different kinds of property and legal rights,’ he said, adding that the ‘instincts’ of family law were increasingly intersecting with those of common law in ways historically unprecedented – for example, through the emergence of nuptial contracts. Cross-fertalisation between different areas of law will require flexibility on the part of practitioners, he argued: ‘I have always been of the opinion that legal specialisations are essentially bogus. At the bar, I liked to trespass on other people’s cabbage patches. As a judge I do it most of the time.’

The full details of Lord Sumption’s speech can be found on Legal Futures

Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]

The Global Legal Post

© 2026 The Global Legal Post. All Rights Reserved

Top