Class action lawyers in the spotlight

Tomorrow, the US Supreme Court might step in to debunk the “fraud on the market” theory which, according to a new study conducted by the Institute for Legal Reform, results in class-action lawyers receiving more than their fair share of fees.

The US Supreme Court might debunk the “fraud on the market” theory which results in class-action lawyers receiving more than their fair share of fees. trekandshoot

The Institute for Legal Reform released a study last week on where money goes in US class action suits.  It found that the “fraud on the market” theory,  established by the Supreme Court in 1988 case Basic vs. Levinson, may be the reason these cases cost around $39 billion per year— whilst just $5 billion is recovered.  The theory concerns class-action securities suits and allows lawyers to assemble actions for every investor who sells stock at a loss, regardless of why the stock dipped.  Leonard Masiowski, an investor awaiting his share of over $2.4 billion from a Bank of America case, said: “We need to find a way to have the lawyers’ fees capped in such a way that the system can’t be milked.”  The Supreme Court will reconsider the 1988 decision tomorrow in Haliburton v. Erica Fund. Source: Forbes.com 
 

Email your news and story ideas to: news@globallegalpost.com

Top