Doubts emerge about reasons for prosecuting Dewey trio

As the Dewey & LeBoeuf prosecutors emerge from a four-month trial that has been declared a mistrial, questions are being raised about whether there should have been a trial at all and if it was approached in the right way.
Prefer the Global Legal Post on Google

Reuters

There are those who believe that, despite the list of 100 charges against the three former senior executives at the law firm, there might not have been criminal breaches in the actions that the prosecutors highlighted. One juror said: 'I see a law firm that folded over and made a whole lot of mistakes. I don’t see a crime in those mistakes.'

Crossing the line

And columnist Reynolds Holding said in a piece for the Breakingviews blog on Reuters: 'It’s unclear the alleged wrongdoing was even illegal. Backdating checks, counting partner contributions as revenue and other shenanigans may cross the line but don’t stray far from typical number-crunching methodologies.' Source: ABA

Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]

Top