• Twitter Global Legal Post
  • RSS Global Legal Post News

Editor's picks

BLOG: WHISTLEBLOWERS

Is Ranbaxy the Tip of the Iceberg?

As a result of a 2007 lawsuit initiated by a whistleblower under the US Federal False Claims Act, Ranbaxy USA has agreed to pay the United States Government and multiple state governments the sum of $350 million to resolve civil claims.

BLOG: EMPLOYMENT

Waiting for roast duck

Contrasts between China and Europe are most noticable in workplace attitudes, says Bob Gogel.

OUTSOURCING

Exigent extends into Canada

Exigent, a leading global provider of legal process outsourcing (LPO), is opening a centre in Canada.

HOT GOSSIP

New Hampshire's 'Robin Hood' accused of harassment

A group of friends nicknamed 'Robin Hood' who roam a US city and fill up parking meters which are about to expire have been hit with a lawsuit claiming they harass parking enforcers.

DOING THE DEALS

Dealmakers

A round-up of recent global deals and the lawyers who made them happen

MOVES

In and out

A weekly round-up of who's moving up, down or out in global legal practice

BLOG: SOCIAL MEDIA

Is the world still flat?

SEC social media rule overlooks rules of engagement around the world, says Veta T Richardson, president and chief executive officer of the Association of Corporate Counsel.

BLOG: LEGAL PROFESSION

Which way now for Personal Injury lawyers?

Personal injury (PI) lawyers are working in an era of fundamental and evolutionary change, not least because of the changes driven by the Jackson reforms but also because of the changing attitudes of banks and funders to PI law firms.

LUXURY LAW SUMMIT

Luxury brands head for the summit

A raft of top luxury brands are on the VIP list for the first ever Luxury Law Summit.

PFI

PF2: a new approach to public private partnerships?

James Larmour of Freeth Cartwright considers HM Treasury's “Standardisation of PF2 Guidance.”

LUXURY LAW SUMMIT

Growing legal issues for luxury sector

Luxury companies are reporting an increase in the breadth and depth of legal issues engulfing the sector, according to research carried out for the Luxury Law Summit 2013.

07 August 2012 at 11:28 BST

US regulator rejects foreign law schools

US legal education regulators have rejected proposals to accredit foreign law schools in a move that will stoke continued debate over protectionism in the American legal profession.

Chicago: Windy reception for foreign law school proposals

Chicago: Windy reception for foreign law school proposals

Leading players from outside the US described the decision by the American Bar Association as ‘disappointing, but predictable’.  And the head of the biggest law school in Europe said the move would have little practical impact as crucial individual state bars could still recognise overseas accreditation.

Overwhelming rejection

The ABA decision was taken in a vote by its council of legal education and admissions to the bar, which was meeting at the association’s annual conference, held over the last few days in Chicago. According to a report in the National Law Journal, the council spent half an hour considering the matter at the annual meeting before rejecting overwhelmingly the option of approving overseas law schools.
Despite the brevity of that meeting, the council’s chairman, John O’Brien, maintained that the ABA had comprehensively analysed the issue over the last two years, having launched two studies into various possibilities. ‘The thoroughness of the study and the number of groups that weighed in had a big impact on the final decision,’ Mr O’Brien told the newspaper.

Predictable

Officials from the Peking University School of Transnational Law, which was founded five years ago by former dean of the law school at the University of Michigan –made submissions to the council last month backing the case for accrediting overseas institutions.  
Likewise, England’s College of Law – Europe’s biggest legal education institution and recently privatised -- is also understood to have been enthusiastic about potential ABA accreditation. The college’s chief executive, Professor Nigel Savage, said the association’s Chicago decision was ‘disappointing but predictable’. He described the US regulators as ‘even more conservative’ than their counterparts in England – the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Bar Standards Board.

New York joy

But Prof Savage predicted the ABA ruling would ultimately have only a limited impact on the college’s US aspirations, as it was more important to target specific state jurisdictions. He pointed to recent moves by the New York state bar to accredit the college’s graduate diploma in law course, which means that for the first time those students will be eligible to sit the New York bar entrance exam.
Prof Savage also called on the SRA to ‘embrace the opportunity’ for the English jurisdiction to welcome overseas students.

Add Comments

Comments will be edited and authorized at the discretion of The Global Legal Post. The website also has the right not to publish selected comments.

  • Name
  • Email address
  • Comments

Premium Jobs

Vacancy of the week

Research

Martindale-Hubbell

European GCs slam lack of client service

Law firms across Europe are failing to look after their retained clients with general counsel slating the lack of communication and regular reviews, according to new research from the Global Legal Post in association with Martindale-Hubbell.

To download the report in full, click here.

 
   
 
 
 

Luxury Law Summit 2013

Venue: The Caledonian Club, London
23rd May 2013
The Luxury Law Summit will bring together luxury business leaders, luxury legal experts and regulators for high level networking, debate and informative roundtable sessions.