The default private equity (PE) playbook in professional services is the buy-and-build. A PE investor acquires a platform firm and then deploys private capital and professionalisation strategies to drive performance over a five-year horizon.
Under this model, bolt-on acquisitions accelerate revenue growth and expand the client base along the way. It is a playbook that has worked well in accountancy and wealth management, where clients are sticky and recurring revenue is close to guaranteed.
The three main PE-backed regional consolidators now active in legal – Blixt (Law Front), August Equity (Higgs) and Horizon Capital (FBC Manby Bowdler) – all built their track records doing exactly this in accountancy before turning their attention to law.
However, the PE project in UK legal, at least in its regional, buy-and-build incarnation, is failing to gain the same traction as it did in accountancy.
The data tells its own story.
Since 2018, PE investors have deployed capital into UK legal firms with a combined annual revenue of approximately £1.84bn – across 43 confirmed transactions spanning eight years. That sounds significant until you hold it against the size of the market.
UK legal is a £40bn-plus sector. Even at face value, £1.84bn in firm revenue across nearly a decade of activity is not dominance – it is a footnote. And the headline figure flatters the reality considerably. Strip out DWF, which was taken private by Inflexion in 2023 in a deal which many serious observers regard as a refinancing and stabilisation exercise rather than a pure PE growth play, and the total falls to approximately £1.4bn. That is around 3.5% of the market, accumulated over eight years, by dozens of different investors.
This is not a sector being taken over by private equity. It never was.
More than 90% of PE deals in UK legal have taken place since 2020. There were earlier transactions – at Knights, Keoghs and Keystone, among others – but it was Covid that truly accelerated investor interest.
The pandemic demonstrated that law firms are far more resilient than most had assumed. The business of law proved largely immune to macroeconomic shocks; if anything, it thrived in the disruption.
Activity peaked sharply in 2023 and 2024 – driven by a cluster of regional buy-and-build transactions and the outlier DWF deal – before falling away just as sharply.
By 2025, deal volumes were already cooling.
In 2026, to date, there have been precisely two transactions: a minority patient capital stake in sports boutique Northridge Law taken by a US investor with no prior UK legal presence; and Lawfront’s acquisition of Field Seymour Parkes – a profitable Reading firm that has not seen any sizeable relative growth, like many regional firms – representing the continuation of Blixt’s methodical regional roll-up rather than any new wave of PE interest.
Either regional law firms are beginning to question whether PE ownership is right for them – possible, if unlikely – or, more plausibly, investor appetite has cooled as the underlying distress in the regional market becomes harder to ignore.
That is consistent with what I am hearing directly from investors and from the small number of M&A advisers in this space who genuinely know what they are doing.
Acquisition multiples have fallen sharply, with the regional market now pricing deals at around 5-6x.
Reports suggesting that most managing partners have been approached by PE investors are largely a fiction – the product of M&A brokers and corporate finance boutiques working both sides of a deal, pitching 9x multiples to law firms before shopping the brief around the investment community, hoping for a response.
The result is predictable: deals collapsing during commercial due diligence when investors find the firm is not worth what the broker promised. The proof of concept has not arrived. Until it does – and a Blixt exit at a meaningful multiple would change sentiment overnight – the market will remain subdued.
Deteriorating regional market
The problem for PE is that, despite the Covid bounce, the UK regional legal market has been quietly deteriorating for years.
Worth approximately £4bn in annual revenue, the regional sector comprises hundreds of firms – the vast majority operating as traditional LLP partnerships offering a broad range of services.
Earlier this year, I undertook a substantial commercial review of a selection of regional firms. The findings were stark.
Across the sample, consistent patterns emerged: equity partners keeping the equity door firmly shut on salary partners; salary costs rising ahead of revenue growth; and client account interest quietly propping up profit figures that would otherwise be in decline. Both revenue per lawyer (RPL) and profit per lawyer (PPL) were down double digits in more than 80% of the firms reviewed between 2015 and 2025.
I modelled a scenario stripping out client account interest entirely – a reasonable assumption given potential incoming Solicitors Regulation Authority and Ministry of Justice measures – while simultaneously reducing revenue by 10% and increasing salary costs by 5%.
The results were striking: 30% of the sample faced an existential cashflow crisis.
My analysis of LLP filings reveals that debt levels in the regional market have risen materially, with firms borrowing more from banks to fund day-to-day operations.
Equity partners are increasingly reluctant to provide personal funding, yet personal guarantees are already live on many LLP banking facilities.
When borrowings exceed 20% of revenue, recovery becomes very difficult. The current average for firms between £10m and £35m sits at around 9% – up from approximately 5% pre-Covid – and a significant number of regional firms already carry borrowings above 15%.
Scaling these businesses while sustaining quality and profitability is becoming increasingly difficult (see my analysis of Knights below for an example of a firm that is getting this right). Firms have grown – almost all of them have – but in many cases, the quality is being steadily diluted. Years of underinvestment in operating models while equity partners continued to extract substantial drawings are finally catching up.
Midlands firm Wright Hassall, which was sold to HCR Law in November as part of a pre-pack administration, and London-based Rosling King, which was heading into administration before its acquisition by HF last month, are the most recent high-profile casualties.
More will follow, or firms will find a way to survive through absorption by larger regional players.
Meanwhile, PE’s retreat from the regional sector will accelerate. There will be fewer investment deals, more trade M&A and an inevitable reckoning for firms that have relied on client account interest to paper over structural weakness. When the SRA removes that lifeline – and it surely will – the decisions facing many regional firms will be existential.
Size matters
PE investors are slowly coming to terms with another reality: size matters in UK legal, and the firms large enough to be genuinely attractive are increasingly beyond their reach. The larger the firm, the less willing a partnership is to cede control to an investor on a five-year clock.
What these firms will consider – and I have heard this directly from leaders at multiple firms above £180m in revenue – is patient, long-term capital: minority investment linked purely to growth and technology over a 10- to 20-year horizon.
That model excludes most mid-market PE funds, but opens the door to family offices, pension funds and international sovereign or wealth vehicles, particularly those from the Middle East. This is where the genuinely transformative capital will come from in UK legal.
In the short term, consumer-facing investments are where we have seen the sector’s most tangible successes, including a notable exit and secondary transaction at Stowe Family Law, which was sold by Livingbridge to Bahrain-based private equity giant Investcorp. The consumer model is built around demand generation and process delivery rather than individual lawyer relationships. Stowe and Fletchers have shown what is possible when those fundamentals are right. The regional story is a different one entirely.
The uncomfortable truth is that PE came into the regional UK legal with confidence borrowed from accountancy. But scaling a law firm is an entirely different challenge, and the formula that worked in one sector has not translated cleanly to the other.
Having reviewed numerous PE due diligence processes in this sector, I can say with confidence that they are typically long on data requests and short on assessment of people, culture and appetite for change.
What this period has produced is scale without substance. The exits have not materialised, the proof of concept has not arrived and the regional distress that made some firms look like opportunity is now making them look like potential risks.
It must also be noted that almost all accountancy roll-ups occurred in a pre-AI world, whereas legal consolidation by PE funds is happening against the background of AI’s growing impact on the sector. This has increased the risk of investing whilst making the task of modelling exits more tricky, spooking many investment committees which are now keeping their powder dry more than previously
This helps explain why there has not been a new PE deal in the regional space for the best part of a year.
With PE investors stepping back from the sector, one of the few remaining rescue mechanisms has been removed. The next 12 to 24 months will be the most testing the regional market has faced.
Knights case study
Knights, which is publicly listed, is a standout performer among buy-and-build regional law firms. When you compare it against the PE-backed consolidators, analysing their operating model, lock-up, RPL and PPL trajectories, and profit margin, the contest is not close. Knights wins comprehensively. It has out-thought, out-bought and out-executed every PE investor in this market. Its 17 post-Covid acquisitions alone approach the combined total of Blixt, Horizon and August.
Critically, Knights has made the difficult decision to cut headcount where necessary, restructure partner remuneration around performance rather than seniority and hold the line on quality.
Over a sustained period, Knights has consistently delivered against the key metrics, driving profitable growth ahead of inflation:
- Improve revenue per lawyer and profit per lawyer, alongside growing revenue and almost 30 acquisitions
- Make tough or risky decisions to achieve their goals
- Entrepreneurial management team and commercially minded CEO
- National presence with offices in most major cities
- Sector-leading lock-up and back-office leverage.
Knights recently confirmed it has surpassed £200m in revenue – a milestone reached through double-digit organic growth alongside three acquisitions in 2025. As the regional market becomes more distressed, Knights increasingly stands out as a credible cash acquirer, underpinned by its access to public markets funding. This is the regional powerhouse that the wider market has consistently underestimated and the markets have undervalued.
I have been making this case for some time, grounded in data and performance rather than sentiment. The conditions now favour Knights more than at any point in its history.
With close to 30 acquisitions completed, Knights has built a regional acquisition engine with a proven integration playbook and the capacity to absorb larger deals. Confirmed discussions with Moore Barlow – a firm generating more than £40m in revenue – signal that the firm is ready to move into a different deal bracket entirely.
In my view, Knights will be the defining £500m regional law firm of this decade, with a credible path to £1bn in revenue beyond that. With access to public capital, a proven acquisition engine and an organic growth story now beginning to emerge through lateral hiring, technology investment and pricing discipline – with AI likely to play an increasingly significant role – the components of a transformational business are all present.
Knights has the acquisition expertise, the integration playbook and the balance sheet to capitalise on a regional market that is producing more distressed firms with fewer exit options. Trade mergers are typically cashless. Knights is the one buyer in this market that can offer partners genuine liquidity alongside a platform with a demonstrable track record of growth. That combination is rare.
Adil Taha is the founder of Taha & Co, an advisory business focused on UK law firms and private equity firms.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]
