The fashion industry in Peru is distinguished by its rich cultural heritage and exceptional textile quality. It is driven by skilled artisans and the use of premium natural fibers such as alpaca and vicuña, recognized worldwide for their softness and durability. Many renowned designers — including Jorge Salinas, Meche Correa, and Ani Alvarez Calderon — have presented international collections inspired by Peru’s history, traditions, and ancestral craftsmanship, positioning the country as a reference for sustainable, contemporary, and culturally rooted fashion.
In Peru, the main Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) applicable to the fashion industry are trademarks, industrial designs, copyright, trade secrets, domain names, and, in some cases, patents. Each offers different durations, grant procedures, and advantages or limitations when protecting creations in the fashion industry.
| IPR | Duration | Time and modalities for grant | Pros and cons in the fashion sector |
| Trademarks | 10 years (counted from the date of grant and renewable). | Procedure: Registration before INDECOPI. Legal timeframe: 180 business days. | Pros: · Identifies and differentiates fashion products from another economic agent. · Protects non-traditional trademarks (three-dimensional, color, position, pattern, among others). · Registration can be obtained relatively quickly, approximately 2–3 months (if no oppositions or official objections are filed). · Duration can be renewed indefinitely. Con: Can be subject to cancellation actions for non-use after 3 years from its registration. |
| Design | 10 years (counted from the filing date and not renewable). | Procedure: Registration before INDECOPI. Legal timeframe: 24 months. | Pros: · Protects the aesthetic appearance of garments, footwear, jewelry, accessories, and other products. · Registration is relatively quick. Cons: · Limited duration, non-renewable. · Does not protect functional aspects, only external appearance. |
| Trade secrets | Indefinite (as long as confidentiality is maintained). | Procedure and timeframe: No registration required; protection depends on confidentiality measures. | Pros: · Useful for protecting formulas and methods such as garment construction, dyeing, and related processes, as well as supplier and client databases. · No registration required. · Indefinite protection as long as confidentiality is maintained. Con: High risk of loss if the trade secret is disclosed. |
| Domain names | One year (renewable). | Procedure: Registration before relevant domain Authority. Legal timeframe: One or more days. | Pros: · Protects the digital identity of fashion trademarks. · Quick registration. Con: Requires periodic renewal (usually every year). |
| Patents | 20 years (invention patent). 10 years (utility model) (counted from the filing date and not renewable). | Procedure: Registration before INDECOPI. Legal timeframe: · 60 months (invention patent). · 36 months (utility model). | Pro: Protects technical innovations related to fashion, such as smart textile fibers, special fabrics, or novel parts of garments or accessories. Cons: · Long procedure. · Must meet the requirement of absolute novelty. |
| Copyright | Life of the author + 70 years | Procedure: Registration before INDECOPI. Legal timeframe: 120 business days. | Pros: · Automatic legal protection from creation, without registration (though registration is recommended for legal certainty). · Protects illustrations, fashion photographs, catalogs, prints, and related works. · Long duration. Cons: · Must meet the originality requirement. · Not ideal for mass-produced clothing; better suited for artistic fashion garments and accessories. |
In Peru, trademark protection is governed by Decision 486 of the Andean Community and Legislative Decree 1075 and is administered by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI). Both traditional trademarks (word trademarks, figurative trademarks, and mixed trademarks) and non-traditional trademarks can be registered, such as:
- Color trademarks. Colors defined by a specific shape (for example, Tiffany Blue color by Tiffany & Co., the red soles of Louboutin shoes, Hermès orange on rectangular boxes).
- Three-dimensional trademarks. The three-dimensional shape of a product (for example, the clog-shaped shoe with perforations by Crocs, the Lady Dior handbag by Christian Dior).
- Position trademarks. Protects a specific element placed in a particular location on the garment (for example, the red label sewn on the back pocket of jeans by Levi’s).
- Pattern trademarks. This category does not exist in Peru; however, repetitive patterns applied to textiles or accessories are usually filed and registered as figurative trademarks.
In Peru, unregistered trademarks have limited protection through good-faith prior use or unfair competition actions (Article 137, Decision 486), but strong evidence of continuous use is required; thus, registration is always recommended.
When an article is described as “Made in”, this is not an intellectual property right but a mandatory labeling rule. The Andean Technical Regulation for footwear, leather goods, travel items, and similar products requires the indication of the country of origin in order to prevent confusion and highlight the authenticity of Peruvian goods such as alpaca or Pima cotton garments.
Recently, non-traditional trademark registrations in fashion — three-dimensional, pattern, and position marks — have increased, reflecting the growing relevance of protecting distinctive aesthetics.
In the fashion industry, industrial design protects the aesthetic appearance of products, such as distinctive cuts, shapes, patterns, or details in garments, footwear, handbags, and accessories. It can serve as an alternative or complement to trademarks — protecting a product’s form alongside its brand. For instance, a luxury handbag may register its logo as a trademark and its shape as an industrial design for broader protection. Its advantage lies in safeguarding visual aesthetics, though its main limitation is a non-renewable 10-year term.
In the fashion industry, copyright protects original works fixed in tangible form, such as sketches, prints, or photos. Although registration is not mandatory, it proves authorship. Protection applies to original, creative, and tangible works. It may complement or replace trademarks — for instance, an original textile pattern may be copyrighted while a handbag logo is trademarked. Protection is automatic, lasting for the author’s life plus 70 years, but excludes ideas or functional designs.
In Peru, there are other relevant intellectual property rights in the fashion industry:
- Invention patents and utility models. These protect technical innovations like smart fabrics, special fibers, or footwear which incorporates technology. Protection applies only to functional aspects, lasting 20 years for inventions and 10 for utility models, both requiring registration. This protection is more common for technological or sustainable textiles.
- Geographical indications and designations of origin. None of these indications or designations are registered for garments or accessories in Peru, though they can add value — e.g., Harris Tweed (Scotland).
- Trade secrets. These cover confidential data such as production methods or supplier lists, provided confidentiality is maintained. No registration is required, and protection is indefinite.
- Domain names. These protect the digital identity of fashion trademarks.
License agreements
In Peru, trademark licensing agreements are fundamental to the manufacture of fashion goods. Article 162 of Decision 486 authorizes the owner of a registered or pending trademark to grant licenses for its use to third parties. In practice, this occurs when, for example, an international brand allows a local textile manufacturer to produce and market garments bearing its distinctive signs and designs. Essential clauses include territorial delimitation, term of validity, royalty payments, quality standards, owner supervision mechanisms, and a prohibition on reselling surplus or excess production, ensuring that the licensee uses the trademark only under the agreed terms and without affecting its prestige.
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are widely used in the Peruvian fashion industry when brands share sensitive information — such as designs, patterns, or unpublished catalogs — with local manufacturers. Under Decision 486 and the Unfair Competition Law, such information is protected as a trade secret. Accordingly, NDAs typically define what is considered confidential, the duration of confidentiality, restrictions on disclosure or unauthorized use, prohibitions on producing surpluses or copies, required security measures, and the legal consequences or compensation for any breach, in line with civil law provisions.
Subcontract agreements with suppliers/in-house manufacturing
Supply contracts are widely used in the textile sector and are governed by the Civil Code (Articles 1604–1620) and relevant sectoral regulations. They typically cover delivery times, quality standards, compliance audits, ownership of patterns and designs, and liability for defects. These agreements also include labor clauses to ensure formal compliance and prevent illegal practices, as well as setting out termination mechanisms and financial penalties for breach. A key provision requires that any subcontracting be previously and expressly authorized by the main contractor, ensuring control over the production chain and final product quality.
Agency agreement
Peru has no specific law on agency contracts or indemnity. However, indemnity can be agreed through an express clause in the contract defining the events or losses covered. In the absence of specific rules, agency agreements are governed by the general principles of the Civil Code.
Selective distribution online in high-end fashion and trademark protection
In high-end fashion, selective distribution agreements often include clauses restricting authorized points of sale (including online) to preserve brand image. An example in the Peruvian market is the luxurious international brand Louis Vuitton, which maintains a selective distribution scheme by marketing its products only through its official store in Jockey Plaza, operated by Louis Vuitton Peru S.R.L., thus ensuring direct control of its sales network and protecting its brand from unauthorized channels.
Co-branding and co-marketing
Co-branding and co-marketing agreements are commercial contracts that regulate shared brand use and joint promotions. They usually include clauses on royalties, quality control, coexistence, and termination for reputational harm, protecting each party’s image. A notable example is the adidas–Los Mirlos collaboration, which launched a collection inspired by Amazonian culture, highlighting co-branding’s value as a marketing strategy.
Franchising and alternative sales model agreements
In Peru, franchising is configured as an atypical contract and is governed by the general principles of contracts regulated by the Civil Code, in which the franchisor grants the franchisee the use of its brand and know-how in exchange for royalties. These agreements, like corner store agreements, consignment contracts, and pop-up stores, must include key clauses such as confidentiality, non-competition, quality control, audits, periodic royalties, commercial image, product returns, settlement terms, and early termination for breach, in addition to establishing mechanisms to protect against reputational damage. The purpose of these clauses is to ensure the consistency of the business model, protect the brand’s prestige, and guarantee transparency in the commercial relationship.
Payment models vary: consignment involves sales commissions; multi-brand stores share rent or revenue; and fairs or pop-ups charge fixed or commission-based fees.
Employing fashion models
In the Peruvian fashion industry, contracts with models are generally executed as independent service agreements rather than employment contracts, depending on the brand–model relationship. They usually include clauses on image rights, defining the authorized use of photographs and videos, duration, territory, payment, and confidentiality. It is also common to sign model release forms authorizing the use of the model’s image in print, digital, or social media campaigns, protecting the company from future claims and ensuring compliance with Peruvian image rights and advertising regulations.
Social media, influencers and brand ambassadors/celebrities
In Peru, contracts with influencers, brand ambassadors, or celebrities must clearly establish the duration of the campaign, financial compensation, publication obligations, exclusivity terms, conduct standards, ownership of the content generated, and termination clauses in case of breach or reputational damage. It is also essential to specify how and for how long the influencer’s image may be used, ensuring compliance with personal data protection regulations.
These provisions apply not only to social media campaigns but also to product promotion in pop-up stores, where physical and digital interactions converge to strengthen brand visibility and consumer engagement.
Advertising standards, relevant authorities and advertising practice
In Peru, fashion advertising must comply with INDECOPI’s standards of truthfulness and the Consumer Protection Law, avoiding misleading information about products, while advertising contracts include clauses on content approval, supervision, responsibilities, and reputation protection. In addition, influencers must clearly indicate when their content is advertising or sponsored and declare their income to the Customs Authority (SUNAT), complying with applicable taxes, ensuring transparency for consumers and tax compliance.
In Peru, the regulation of digital marketing and e-commerce is governed by a combination of legal frameworks, rather than a single, specific statute. The Consumer Protection and Defense Code (Law No. 29571) guarantees key consumer rights such as access to information, fair contractual terms, and mechanisms like the Virtual Complaints Book. This Code is complemented by other important laws, including Legislative Decree No. 1044 on unfair competition, Law No. 28493 regulating unsolicited electronic communications (SPAM), Law No. 29733 on personal data protection, and Laws No. 27291 and No. 27269, which govern electronic contracting and digital signatures.
Enforcement faculties are shared between INDECOPI, which oversees advertising practices and e-commerce platforms, and the National Authority for the Protection of Personal Data, which monitors the processing of personal data. Both entities possess sanctioning powers; however, they face significant challenges in regulating informal sellers and digital activity on global social media platforms.
A notable recent development is the enactment of Law No. 31814, along with its implementing regulations on Artificial Intelligence (AI), which introduce guiding principles such as transparency, ethics, and security. The law classifies AI systems according to their level of risk and explicitly prohibits harmful practices like subliminal manipulation and algorithmic discrimination.
Consumer protection in the fashion industry aims to ensure that products are suitable, safe, and provide sufficient information for an informed purchasing decision, under the principle of interpretation most favorable to the consumer. A consumer is considered to be any natural or legal person who purchases goods as the end user, except those who do so for commercial purposes, with the exception of micro-entrepreneurs in a situation of information asymmetry. Sanctioning procedures may be initiated by complaint, ex officio, or by legitimate associations.
The Consumer Protection and Defense Code establishes that the right to information obliges suppliers to provide accurate, clear, and Spanish-language information on materials, sizes, origin, care, total price, additional costs, and return policies. Failure to comply, such as advertising “organic” garments that are not organic, constitutes a violation. Suitability requires that what is offered corresponds to what is received, without the need for permits or authorizations.
Overall, the law requires transparency, responsibility, and foresight, as failure to comply results in administrative penalties and affects consumer confidence, which is essential in the fashion industry.
Intellectual property regulations do not expressly protect store layout as an independent right. The Copyright Law (Legislative Decree No. 822) covers original architectural and design works, but focuses on plans and buildings rather than interior layouts. Under Andean Decision 486, three-dimensional, position, and trade dress marks may be protected if distinctive and non-functional, allowing store design elements to qualify when they create a unique identity.
In digital commerce, there are no specific rules for virtual store layouts, though original interface designs may receive copyright protection. The Unfair Competition Law also penalizes imitation of physical or digital business appearances that mislead consumers.
In Peru, the Unfair Competition Law (Legislative Decree No. 1044) is the main regulation in this area, which applies to the fashion industry. The authority responsible for its enforcement is INDECOPI through the Unfair Competition Office, which investigates reported conduct and may impose penalties that vary according to the severity and impact of the infringement.
Among the most frequent practices in this sector are acts of confusion (Article 9), which punish the imitation of brands, packaging, or presentations that mislead consumers about the origin of products. Also included are acts of undue exploitation of another’s reputation (Article 10), which occur when the prestige of a brand or designer is used without authorization, as well as acts of deception (Article 8), which occur when advertising or labeling create confusion about the quality, nature, or origin of garments. Added to this are acts against trade secrets (Article 13), which protect confidential processes, techniques, and databases that provide competitive advantages, further reinforced by Andean Decision 486.
The regulation also establishes that when such conduct affects intellectual property rights, jurisdiction lies with INDECOPI’s Trademark Office. This allows trademark infringement to also be prosecuted as an act of confusion or undue exploitation of reputation of others.
A highly publicized case in Peru was Kipling v. Walon Sport (File Number 922497-2021-DSD), where the latter sold products imitating Kipling’s trade dress and trademarks. Kipling, a globally recognized brand known for its backpacks, bags, and accessories, saw its reputation affected by the infringement. Due to repeated violations and bad faith, INDECOPI imposed the maximum fine of UIT 150 (The Unidad Impositiva Tributaria (UIT) is a reference unit set annually by the Peruvian Ministry of Economy, determining in turn taxes, penalties, fines, processing fees, deductions, and others: UIT 150 equated in this instance to around USD 200,000), a decision upheld on appeal in August 2023, setting a strong precedent for protecting trademarks and trade dress in the Peruvian fashion industry.
In Peru, there is no specific regulation on sustainability in the fashion industry or ESG standards exclusive to this sector. However, various legal and technical mechanisms promote its integration into business practices. Law No. 31072 (BIC Law, 2020) allows companies to adopt the “BIC” category when incorporating environmental or social purposes into their bylaws. These companies must submit an annual sustainability report verified by an accredited expert. Although the law grants no tax benefits, it provides reputational value through the “BIC” designation.
Certification systems also contribute. The Blue Certificate, granted by the National Water Authority (ANA), recognizes companies that reduce their water footprint. The B System, an international initiative operating in Peru, certifies companies meeting social, environmental, and governance standards, promoting sustainability goals in their statutes.
Regulatorily, the Andean Technical Regulation on Clothing Labeling requires garments sold in Peru to include composition, origin, size, manufacturer details, and care instructions (ISO 3758:2012). Labels must be legible, visible, and unaltered, and INDECOPI treats them as sworn statements subject to penalties for noncompliance.
Although there is no rule specifically addressing greenwashing, false or misleading sustainability claims may be sanctioned under the Unfair Competition Law. Intellectual property law also supports sustainable fashion. Decision 486 and national regulations allow registration of collective and certification marks, enabling associations to emphasize sustainable or cultural attributes. INDECOPI’s Collective Trademark Platform promotes artisans and SMEs, improving visibility and market access.
Finally, the National Institute of Quality (INACAL) ensures technical standards through Peruvian Technical Standards (NTP) aligned with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
In Peru, the import and export of fashion products, such as clothing, footwear, and accessories, is regulated by the General Customs Law (Legislative Decree No. 1053). Although there is no special regime, the sector is considered high risk due to smuggling and counterfeiting, which justifies reinforced control by SUNAT. SUNAT may immobilize and seize goods in the event of irregularities. In practice, clothing and footwear are the most frequently seized goods: in 2024, seizures exceeded USD 224.8 million in more than 17,900 control actions, with clothing, footwear, and used clothing being the most affected products.
Additionally, border measures on intellectual property are governed by Legislative Decree No. 1092, which establishes special provisions for the protection of IP rights. To benefit from this system, trademark owners must voluntarily register their trademarks in SUNAT’s database. Once registered, when goods enter the country, SUNAT intervenes with a selective control system that classifies customs declarations for shipments into three channels. If, during a physical inspection, SUNAT identifies products bearing trademarks that could potentially infringe registered rights, it issues an alert to the representatives designated by trademark owners in Peru so they can take the corresponding legal actions.
What is the legal approach against the infringement of a company’s intellectual property rights if it does not have its trademarks or designs registered in Peru?
When a trademark or design is not registered in Peru, we usually recommend enforcing the brand owner’s rights on the grounds of acts of unfair competition or copyright infringement.
The Unfair Competition Law (Legislative Decree No. 1044) regulates conduct that causes confusion among consumers, takes unfair advantage of the prestige of others, or systematically reproduces a product for competitive purposes. Additionally, in some cases, protection under copyright law may be applied without having a copyright certificate, in appliance of the Berne Convention. A claim for copyright infringement can be filed through an administrative proceeding before INDECOPI or as a criminal matter before the IP prosecutor.
What sustainable practices are used in Peru to destroy counterfeit fashion items?
Under Peruvian customs and intellectual property regulations, goods seized for intellectual property rights infringement or smuggling must be destroyed, transferred to the rights holder, or otherwise disposed of by the competent authority. In cases involving intellectual property violations, the rights owners may request the transfer of the goods to apply environmentally responsible disposal methods. These include recycling usable materials, donating components that do not bear infringing trademarks, or transforming the goods — all designed to prevent their reintroduction into the informal market. To ensure compliance with environmental regulations, rights holders often contract authorized waste management companies that operate under the technical standards established by the Ministry of the Environment. This approach not only protects intellectual property but also promotes responsible and sustainable waste treatment practices.
What measures do trademark holders take to prevent the importation of counterfeit fashion goods into Peru?
In Peru, trademark owners play an active role in preventing the entry of counterfeit goods by registering with the Voluntary Registry of Customs Border Measures, as established under Law No. 1092, which sets out border enforcement provisions for the protection of intellectual property rights. This registry provides customs authorities with essential information to help identify potentially infringing goods at the border. When suspicious shipments are detected during inspections, they can be detained at customs and the trademark owner/legal representative can be promptly notified through INDECOPI. The rights holder can then confirm whether the goods are counterfeit and may request their seizure, as well as initiating administrative proceedings or criminal action.